
Cankosyan thinks that Brandon Jacobs will hit the big time in 2007.
|
What is your overall strategy heading into an
Auction-style draft?
Auction-style
drafts are all about budgets and value per pick, while snake drafts are about
getting the best talent available. For
example, I would have loved to get a top-ten back, but I felt that the price
was prohibitive. At the prices they
were going for, I would have had to forgo on getting a top-ten WR. I felt that I could find bargain RBs ranked
15-20th in most snake drafts, and they money I saved could be investing in an
incomparable quarterback and receiving combination. The shortfall in production
from my RB would be more than overcome by the tremendous production I’d
be getting from my WRs and TE.
How is this different (if at all) from the strategy you
use in traditional snake drafts?
In snake drafts, I target RBs with
my first two picks regardless of my draft position. In this draft, I let the top-ten RBs go, because I felt that the
money could be put to better use at WR, TE, and QB. After the top four RBs (LT, Jackson, LJ, and Gore), I didn’t
think any RB was worth more than $20. I
preferred to use the funds on Harrison, Holt, Gates, and Palmer.
Other than your picks, which selection was too pricey
in your opinion?
All of the top ten RBs went for
more money than they should have, but Maroney ($26) was probably the most
overpriced simply because he hasn’t done anything yet to justify the high price
tag. Spending big money on unproven and
injury-prone RBs that haven’t proven that they can should the load will kill
you if you guess wrong. The time to
gamble is late rounds in snake drafts and never in auction-style drafts where a
mistake will kill your chances for a title.
Other than your picks, which selection was a tremendous
value?
The quarterbacks taken later in
the draft were great value. Tony Romo at $4 has to represent the best
bargain in the draft, because he’s potentially a top-five QB. He has a real shot at 24-28 TDs and 3,400 -
3,900 passing yards, and he went for a fraction of the money spent on Peyton Manning ($16), Carson Palmer ($16), and Drew Brees ($14).
Which was your best/worst picks?
My best pick was Brandon Jacobs ($13), because in the
Giants’ system his numbers will rival that of many more pricey RBs like Travis Henry ($20), Ronnie Brown ($18), Willis McGahee (21), and Rudi Johnson ($23). My worst pick was probably Antonio Gates at $16, because other top TEs
like Gonzalez, Heap and Shockey went for far less money. I could have invested the money I saved on
Gates in a better WR3 than Glenn.
Which team looks the strongest to you, and why?
Other than my own, I
like Baker Leigh’s team the best. He
has a top-ten QB, two very good RBs, and tremendous WRs. Success in auction-style drafts is all about
who can garb the most top-five talent at the key spots (QB, RB, WR), and Scully
pulled it off as well as anyone not named Cankosyan.
Cankosyan's Roster:
|
Pos |
Name |
Team |
Salary |
|
QB |
Carson
Palmer |
Bengals
(CIN) |
16 |
|
RB |
Deuce
McAllister |
Saints
(NOR) |
9 |
|
RB |
Brandon
Jacobs |
Giants
(NYG) |
13 |
|
WR |
Torry
Holt |
Rams
(STL) |
19 |
|
WR |
Marvin
Harrison |
Colts
(IND) |
16 |
|
WR |
Terry
Glenn |
Cowboys
(DAL) |
1 |
|
TE |
Antonio
Gates |
Chargers
(SDG) |
16 |
|
K |
Mike
Nugent |
Jets
(NYJ) |
1 |
|
DEF |
Vikings |
Vikings
(MIN) |
1 |
|
B-QB |
Chad
Pennington |
Jets
(NYJ) |
1 |
|
B-RB |
Chris
Brown |
Titans
(TEN) |
1 |
|
B-RB |
Chester
Taylor |
Vikings
(MIN) |
2 |
|
B-WR |
Isaac
Bruce |
Rams
(STL) |
2 |
|
B-WR |
Bernard
Berrian |
Bears
(CHI) |
2 |