Senior Editor and Founder John T. Georgopoulos is a 15-year veteran of the fantasy sports industry. He has written for several national fantasy magazines and has appeared on sports talk stations around the country.
John has also been a six-time finalist for various Fantasy Sports Writer Association (FSWA) awards; his Fantasy Forecast column was awarded the 2006 Best Fantasy Football In-Season Series by the FSWA.
Steve Breaston was a great pickup as a WR3... but would you take him over another team's starter in 2009?
One of the benefits of being a long-time fantasy
writer is that I've heard just about every cliché there is when it comes to
drafting:
"Never draft a kicker or defense before you have to"
"That guy is good in real life but stinks as a fantasy
QB"
"Always know the rules of the league before sitting down to
draft"
"Running Back by Committee = Fantasy Death"
"Never drink the beer that has stuff floating in it"
One maxim that I've been thinking about recently is
the old "It's better to draft the WR1 of a bad team than the WR3 of a good
team; at least he's the clear starter”.
I asked the Sports Grumblings computer, Mighty Max, to rank wide
receivers by 2008 WCOFF score and by team. To keep things manageable, I
instituted a 32 catch minimum (two receptions per game over a full season). As
always, Max responded quickly and efficiently:
2008
Wide Receiver Fantasy Production by Team
What's interesting to note is that only nine teams
managed to field three receivers who met the search criteria: the Cardinals,
Broncos, Packers, Dolphins, Patriots, Saints, Giants, Jets, Eagles and Steelers. It's also interesting to note that four teams couldn't
even supply two receivers who met the search criteria: the Browns, Jags, Chiefs
and Seahawks.